Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page
Argentina Australia Belgium Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece India
Italy Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Norway Russian Federation South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom United States
AirGunHome.com: THE Worldwide Airgun Forum


AirGunSeals.com Main Page Link
Air Gun Home Forum Index Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Air Gun Home Forum Index » Rifles » Crosman v. Ruger Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
Crosman v. Ruger 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:09 pm Reply with quote
Klaatu
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
Been shooting a Crosman 2100 Classic for a few months now and am looking to upgrade to either Crosman Quest 1000X http://www.pyramydair.com/p/crosman-quest-1000x-kit.shtml or Ruger Air Hawk Combo http://www.pyramydair.com/p/ruger-air-hawk-air-rifle.shtml. From reviews and web searches, they seem about the same so would appreciate anyone's input as to which they prefer.

From my research, both: break barrel springers; Chinese made; 1000 fps; .177 pellets; hardwood stocks, 4x32 economy scopes, fiber optic sights on front, adjustable rear. And they both cost about the same.

Only differences appear to be in appearance and customer service. Ruger's stock a bit darker and better barrel bluing. BUT, customer service for Crosman, from what I gather, is superior to Ruger's (UMAREX, actually). Also parts availability is apparently better for Crosman.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:40 pm Reply with quote
Slavia
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 4382
Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA
Another factor to throw in the mix: Should you ever seek to improve the trigger, there are two popular $35.00 drop-in triggers for the Crosman. With the Ruger you would have to polish, hone, and shim what you've got.

http://www.charliedatuna.com/GRT-III%20Trigger%20New.htm
http://www.airgunsofarizona.com/


Last edited by Slavia on Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:42 pm; edited 1 time in total

_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:41 pm Reply with quote
donec
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 836
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area
You should go to a store where they will let you hold them I tried holding the Ruger and the Quest 1000 and the Storm XT. What I found was for me the Ruger was not comfortable in length but the quest 1000 and storm xt felt the same and fit me better.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:41 pm Reply with quote
fritz
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 2443
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia
The ruger is a clone of the Diana 34. Rumor has it the Ruger isn't that bad, although not acutally made by Ruger, so I don't think I could do that.

All the other members should be able to know which rifle I recommend... the Diana 34. If you don't want to get the 34, then get the Quest. Quest and 34 come in .177 and .22, AFAIK the Ruger only comes in .177.

Dianas are supposed to have a lifetime warranty, and the Quest is backed by Crosman.

Assuming the Ruger does have the TO5 trigger clone, it shouldn't be too hard to tune. Hell, I figured out the TO5 without any kind of manual.

_________________
"I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa

Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.

It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:21 pm Reply with quote
Klaatu
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
fritz wrote:

All the other members should be able to know which rifle I recommend... the Diana 34. If you don't want to get the 34, then get the Quest.


Pretty intriguing suggestion for the Diana 34, Fritz. Thanks. The rifle's positives outweighed the negatives in the reviews I read about it. And the 34 (or Ruger) is the more attractive of two, but the 34's price makes it more of an investment than the expense that the Quest would be. Of coarse, investment in the 34 would be better in the long run since the 34's durability will likely be greater.

Slavia's suggestion for the GRT III trigger upgrade, apparently not available for RWS rifles (according to http://www.charliedatuna.com/GRT-III%20Trigger%20New.htm#grtiiiguns, pretty much determines that the Quest's value is probably greater overall.

BTW, also good advice was Frank Zappa's warning to not eat yellow snow.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:24 pm Reply with quote
broommaster2000
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 5714
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Klaatu wrote:

Slavia's suggestion for the GRT III trigger upgrade, apparently not available for RWS rifles (according to http://www.charliedatuna.com/GRT-III%20Trigger%20New.htm#grtiiiguns, pretty much determines that the Quest's value is probably greater overall.


Am I misreading or are you saying that with that tune part it would be better then a Diana based clone? Mr. Green

_________________
BIG GAP
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:36 pm Reply with quote
Klaatu
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
[quote="broommaster2000"]
Klaatu wrote:

Am I misreading or are you saying that with that tune part it would be better then a Diana based clone? Mr. Green


Guess I'm thinking that a clone's components would likely be inferior to the real article's. That is, although the Ruger appears like the Diana, it's mechanical quality is probably nowhere near it, whereas the Quest is the real article.

I'm just using plain logic here, not actual air gun expertise like you guys have offered.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:46 pm Reply with quote
oddtodd
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 2029
Location: Richmond, IN USA
I have a storm, which is a direct copy of the phantom and quest. THey all have the same innards, just different stocks and scopes. I was really surprised by this. THe quest is just the same rifle with a nicer finish on the stock and a nicer scope. Even the quest 800 which is the same innards with a 22 barrel on it. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with these rifles, but it kind of is fun to have a lego gun. lol I can customize anything with direct crosman parts. I am getting ready to convert my storm xt to a 22 barrel and block.

_________________
Airguns: Two starlings talking "Larry, did you hear that? Larry?? LARRY!!!!"
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:09 pm Reply with quote
Klaatu
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
oddtodd wrote:
I have a storm, which is a direct copy of the phantom and quest. THey all have the same innards, just different stocks and scopes.xt to a 22 barrel and block.


Was intrigued with the Storm too since it appears to be a Quest at around the same price but with a different appearance (lighter stock, etc).

Now with the Ruger v. Diana, don't see how they could be comparable except for appearance considering the huge price difference between the two. Has to be component-related and guts are ultimately what's important.

Of coarse the guts of the Diana are likely superior to the Quest's and if both cost the same, would buy the Diana but can't see shelling-out an additional $100+.

BTW, did I ever say that I'm glad I joined this forum? It's been an education.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:26 pm Reply with quote
kanyon
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 1582
Location: New Zealand
Just keep in mined the Quest is Chinese...
Bam B18/19....

Pete
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:59 pm Reply with quote
fritz
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 2443
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia
The ruger is a CLONE, made in China, the Diana is made in Germany. <- IIRC they have been in business before Henry Ford. With hope the Quest is made in USA, but China is to be expected.

Neither would be anywhere as good as the Diana, and neither would last as long. Neither are backed by a lifetime warranty, but the Diana is. The Diana does not need to be tuned out of the box. If you get a TO5 model, the trigger is OK out of the box, and is adjustable to an extent. Neither of the competition can be adjusted nor expected to perform, although the Quest can be upgraded.

I'm not trying to be a salesman here, but the extra $100 is definitely worth it. Doesn't a good tune cost $100 anyway?

I still tuned my Diana, on my own. Cost about $70 for spring, seal, and lubes from JM. Did trigger work on my own. Too bad for 'ole Frank I learned not to eat yellow snow before I knew he existed.

_________________
"I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa

Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.

It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:12 pm Reply with quote
Klaatu
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
Damn, Fritz. You make good arguments in favor of the Diana. In the long run, this will be the better choice.

But in the short run, my local Gander Mountain will sell me a Quest 1000X for 100 plus sales tax (5%). Don't you think this is too good to pass up?
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:18 pm Reply with quote
Slavia
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 4382
Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA
Quote:
From my research, both: break barrel springers; Chinese made; 1000 fps; .177 pellets; hardwood stocks, 4x32 economy scopes, fiber optic sights on front, adjustable rear. And they both cost about the same.

Only differences appear to be in appearance and customer service. Ruger's stock a bit darker and better barrel bluing. BUT, customer service for Crosman, from what I gather, is superior to Ruger's (UMAREX, actually). Also parts availability is apparently better for Crosman.


So it seems like you're back to where you were at the beginning, perhaps with the third option of buying a more expensive Diana. In the end it might come down to donec's suggestion to check "fit," and after that maybe your reaction to style and finish.

_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:36 pm Reply with quote
fritz
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 2443
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia
I think if it had to be the Quest or the Ruger, definitely the Quest.

After a break in and JM spring, my Super Streak is quite a shooter. I'll assume that the Quest would be the same coming from Crosman.

As Slavia pointed out, Donec does have a good point about shoot-ability. If the gun doesn't fit you, it won't be a pleasure, if at all possible to shoot accurately.

_________________
"I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa

Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.

It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:08 pm Reply with quote
Klaatu
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
So the Diana and the Quest remain.

The Diana comes with a better scope (AO), offers a more pleasing appearance, and isn't Chinese-manufactured. I don't foresee shooting a lot but in the long run, although the it cost over $100 more, the Diana could also turn out costing less overall due to better build and therefore fewer breakdowns.

The Quest is at a better price point, has decent build, offers equal power and accuracy and Crosman's customer service.

I suppose this choice mirrors buying either a Honda Accord (although Japanese) or a BMW.
View user's profile Send private message
Crosman v. Ruger 
  Air Gun Home Forum Index » Rifles
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 6  
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  

Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.


Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
Partial Styling Supplied by Vjacheslav Trushkin Themes Database.