Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page
Argentina Australia Belgium Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece India
Italy Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Norway Russian Federation South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom United States
AirGunHome.com: THE Worldwide Airgun Forum


AirGunSeals.com Main Page Link
Air Gun Home Forum Index Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics » flight stability?
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
flight stability? 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:37 am Reply with quote
dummyracer36
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 723
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
this may have been covered already, but the search funcyion confuses me more than it helps.

it is my understanding that the classic diablo shaped pellet stays stable below the speed of sound due to air friction, and becomes very erratic and unstable near or above the speed of sound.

now some of the rifles out there are more than capable of sending pellets down range well above the sonic barrier. would a more "bullet" shaped or "boat tail" pellet be stable at these speeds?

i'm asking because i am considering casting my own pellets from some tooling i am ordering from Corbin Industries. they offer molds for classic diablo and for boat tails (along with the swaging epuipment for final sizing).
but if the boat tails simply wont work, i dont want to bother wasting the money on the molds.

any opinions or actual data would be greatly appreciated

_________________
"not tonight dear, i have a race in the morning"
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:31 pm Reply with quote
Amigo
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Location: U.S. MidWest
Racer:

What type of air rifle were thinking of using the boat tail "bullets" in?
Success could be very iffy in a springer while there might be a little better chance with a pneumatic.

Amigo
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:34 pm Reply with quote
dummyracer36
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 723
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Amigo, would be mainly for the PCPs, but if i have em on hand... dont see a reason to not test them in some of the springers.

_________________
"not tonight dear, i have a race in the morning"
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:28 pm Reply with quote
Amigo
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Location: U.S. MidWest
A PCP would probably be the most likely to propel a bullet. With more available propellant volume, the greater surface area friction drag of the rifling on the bullet periphery might be over come.

Good luck with your experiment.

Amigo
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:53 am Reply with quote
Slavia
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 4382
Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA
I would certainly try it, but I think you would need a higher twist rate than airgun barrels provide to fully stabilize that elongated projectile. See "Greenhill Formula":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling

_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:38 am Reply with quote
thepaladin
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 930
Location: TN USA
I read somewhere about a new line of commerically available "bullet style" pellets for the higher poered guns both PCP and springer. The answer to the diablo shape is of course to use haevier pellets and keep the spped down slightly below sound speed. Don't really know how the bullets will work. If you try the boat tails I'd be curious to know how they work.

_________________
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:56 pm Reply with quote
Jaxom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2008
Posts: 927
DR,

I would be very interested in your experiment as well. You mentioned about having molds machined. I was thinking along the lines of cast ones myself. If I may ask, what made you think about doing this in the first place?

Two things did it for me. The first was someone I spoke to on another forum where backyard casting foundries is the forums subject. One of the members there gets used wheel weights from tire shops. He takes them home, melts them down and then casts shot for several shot gun clubs near him.

The next thing that put this in the back of my mind was seeing the sinker molds in my spring Bass Pro cataloge. I started to wonder, what if....

Since it seems by your post you're concidering a different shaped pellet, have you also concidered which lead alloy you will be using? This will have an effect on the effency as well.

_________________
.22 2300kt Crosman Custom
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:57 pm Reply with quote
kanyon
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 1582
Location: New Zealand
The hour glass shaped pellet do stay more stable
at sub sonic speeds but as the speed drops the stabillity
will incresse...
Ok..from my flying days...Lets see how my memmorys
holding up....
It has do to with 2 facters...head shape & center of G
a pellet needs to produce drag at the rear to keep it stable
hence the shape....but once the flight speed gets to fast the air
flow over the nose of the pellet will produce neg pressure
zone at the sides of the pellet..with reduces the drag at the rear....
Now you have a pellet with pressure on the noise and no drag at the rear
so the front wants to become the rear... so it turns slightly then the rear regains drag so it straightens up...and this happens over ond over till
the motion over rides the drag / pressure then the pellets starts to tumble.

this is even more noteiceble in wadcutters with the flat noise as the low pressure zones are produced at even lower speeds.

I think this is why Einjins can be fired super sonic with very little efect on them....all the ribs around them produceing a lot of drag along the sides.

Now if you are thinking.....why can a bullet fly at above super sonic speeds?.....becuse it is traveling in a low pressure void....
at super sonic speeds a pressure wave is travelling in front of the bullet & there is now very little pressure on the noise...when these pressure wave are produced is where the sonic boom comes from.
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:08 pm Reply with quote
Amigo
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Location: U.S. MidWest
Kanyon, you NZ guys know your aerodynamics and your physics Exclamation

Maybe that why NOBODY messes with NZ.

BTW, your explanation was well put.

Best regards,

Amigo
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:23 pm Reply with quote
Slavia
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 4382
Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA
Quote:
at super sonic speeds a pressure wave is travelling in front of the bullet & there is now very little pressure on the noise


More to the point is what is happening at the back end of the bullet - nothing. With all the air bunching up in front of the projectile, the tail won't be able to do any steering. To keep the projectile flying straight at that speed, spin stabilization will have to do what drag stabilization can't.

Another fly in the ointment is the trans-sonic region. That shock wave doesn't just form by magic - it forms and dissipates randomly around the projectile starting in the mid 800's (FPS) right up to the speed of sound. Kind of like having a squirming girlfriend riding on the handlebars of your bicycle; steering becomes difficult.

It takes a lot of energy to keep a projectile flying supersonic. Witness supersonic jets - big motors and lots of fuel consumption. A projectile has to rely on the initial energy resulting from its mass and muzzle velocity, and that gets robbed as it rubs through the air. A powder burner solution is to launch a slippery bullet really fast (and spin the bejeebers out of it) so it stays supersonic and true. Even supersonic airguns aren't much faster than the speed of sound, and the projectile will probably transition into the tran-sonic region at some point during the flight.

It might be fun to get one of those ballistics programs and model the situation. Use the software to estimate the ballistic coefficient of the proposed "pellet," and "fire" it at different muzzle velocities. Then see what happens downrange.

_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:33 pm Reply with quote
rsterne
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2998
Location: Coalmont, BC
Here is an interesting diagram I found:



As you can see, the Coefficient of Drag starts increasing at about 75% of Mach (ie just over 800 fps, as Slavia says).... It keeps increasing until about Mach 1.2 (~1300 fps).... This means that the meager ballistics coefficients of our pellets (about 0.010 to 0.035) gets even worse in the transonic region.... Shocked

A .22 LR bullet has a ballistics coefficient of 0.145 (ie 5 to 15 times as good as a pellet).... and they still fall subsonic before they get to 100 yards.... Rolling Eyes

Bob

_________________
Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:14 pm Reply with quote
Jaxom
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2008
Posts: 927
Thanks rsterne for proving me wrong!!! I argued with the nuns that tried to teach me algebra over and over, that I will NEVER need to know this stuff in the real world... OY!

_________________
.22 2300kt Crosman Custom
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:52 pm Reply with quote
broommaster2000
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 5714
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
If you look at those wads of led that they put in .50 air rifles... Mr. Green Those aren't Diabolo shaped.

_________________
BIG GAP
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:02 pm Reply with quote
kanyon
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 1582
Location: New Zealand
broommaster2000 wrote:
If you look at those wads of led that they put in .50 air rifles... Mr. Green Those aren't Diabolo shaped.


WOW...They arn't either..
the round ones ..they have a central mass.
the other type bullet shaped...they are so heavy and fly that slow that
a neg/low pressure dose NOT acure along there sides so there is friction/drag...and when/if there try to turn side on to the on coming air flow they get pushed back to noise first....drive down the road at 100kph
in yer car and stick a peice of wood out the window end wise to the on comeing air flow the try and turn it side on..it will get pushed back end wise
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
flight stability? 
  Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  

Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.


Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
Partial Styling Supplied by Vjacheslav Trushkin Themes Database.