 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | flight stability? |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:37 am |
|
|
| dummyracer36 |
| Senior Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 21 Sep 2008 |
| Posts: 723 |
| Location: St. Louis, Missouri |
|
|
 |
this may have been covered already, but the search funcyion confuses me more than it helps.
it is my understanding that the classic diablo shaped pellet stays stable below the speed of sound due to air friction, and becomes very erratic and unstable near or above the speed of sound.
now some of the rifles out there are more than capable of sending pellets down range well above the sonic barrier. would a more "bullet" shaped or "boat tail" pellet be stable at these speeds?
i'm asking because i am considering casting my own pellets from some tooling i am ordering from Corbin Industries. they offer molds for classic diablo and for boat tails (along with the swaging epuipment for final sizing).
but if the boat tails simply wont work, i dont want to bother wasting the money on the molds.
any opinions or actual data would be greatly appreciated |
|
_________________ "not tonight dear, i have a race in the morning" |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
|
| Amigo |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 18 Sep 2008 |
| Posts: 263 |
| Location: U.S. MidWest |
|
|
 |
Racer:
What type of air rifle were thinking of using the boat tail "bullets" in?
Success could be very iffy in a springer while there might be a little better chance with a pneumatic.
Amigo |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:34 pm |
|
|
| dummyracer36 |
| Senior Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 21 Sep 2008 |
| Posts: 723 |
| Location: St. Louis, Missouri |
|
|
 |
| Amigo, would be mainly for the PCPs, but if i have em on hand... dont see a reason to not test them in some of the springers. |
|
_________________ "not tonight dear, i have a race in the morning" |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:28 pm |
|
|
| Amigo |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 18 Sep 2008 |
| Posts: 263 |
| Location: U.S. MidWest |
|
|
 |
A PCP would probably be the most likely to propel a bullet. With more available propellant volume, the greater surface area friction drag of the rifling on the bullet periphery might be over come.
Good luck with your experiment.
Amigo |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:53 am |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
I would certainly try it, but I think you would need a higher twist rate than airgun barrels provide to fully stabilize that elongated projectile. See "Greenhill Formula":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:38 am |
|
|
| thepaladin |
| Senior Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 12 Dec 2007 |
| Posts: 930 |
| Location: TN USA |
|
|
 |
| I read somewhere about a new line of commerically available "bullet style" pellets for the higher poered guns both PCP and springer. The answer to the diablo shape is of course to use haevier pellets and keep the spped down slightly below sound speed. Don't really know how the bullets will work. If you try the boat tails I'd be curious to know how they work. |
|
_________________ "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke) |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:56 pm |
|
|
| Jaxom |
| Senior Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2008 |
| Posts: 927 |
|
|
|
 |
DR,
I would be very interested in your experiment as well. You mentioned about having molds machined. I was thinking along the lines of cast ones myself. If I may ask, what made you think about doing this in the first place?
Two things did it for me. The first was someone I spoke to on another forum where backyard casting foundries is the forums subject. One of the members there gets used wheel weights from tire shops. He takes them home, melts them down and then casts shot for several shot gun clubs near him.
The next thing that put this in the back of my mind was seeing the sinker molds in my spring Bass Pro cataloge. I started to wonder, what if....
Since it seems by your post you're concidering a different shaped pellet, have you also concidered which lead alloy you will be using? This will have an effect on the effency as well. |
|
_________________ .22 2300kt Crosman Custom |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:57 pm |
|
|
| kanyon |
| Silver Status Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 09 Aug 2008 |
| Posts: 1582 |
| Location: New Zealand |
|
|
 |
The hour glass shaped pellet do stay more stable
at sub sonic speeds but as the speed drops the stabillity
will incresse...
Ok..from my flying days...Lets see how my memmorys
holding up....
It has do to with 2 facters...head shape & center of G
a pellet needs to produce drag at the rear to keep it stable
hence the shape....but once the flight speed gets to fast the air
flow over the nose of the pellet will produce neg pressure
zone at the sides of the pellet..with reduces the drag at the rear....
Now you have a pellet with pressure on the noise and no drag at the rear
so the front wants to become the rear... so it turns slightly then the rear regains drag so it straightens up...and this happens over ond over till
the motion over rides the drag / pressure then the pellets starts to tumble.
this is even more noteiceble in wadcutters with the flat noise as the low pressure zones are produced at even lower speeds.
I think this is why Einjins can be fired super sonic with very little efect on them....all the ribs around them produceing a lot of drag along the sides.
Now if you are thinking.....why can a bullet fly at above super sonic speeds?.....becuse it is traveling in a low pressure void....
at super sonic speeds a pressure wave is travelling in front of the bullet & there is now very little pressure on the noise...when these pressure wave are produced is where the sonic boom comes from. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:08 pm |
|
|
| Amigo |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 18 Sep 2008 |
| Posts: 263 |
| Location: U.S. MidWest |
|
|
 |
Kanyon, you NZ guys know your aerodynamics and your physics
Maybe that why NOBODY messes with NZ.
BTW, your explanation was well put.
Best regards,
Amigo |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:23 pm |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| at super sonic speeds a pressure wave is travelling in front of the bullet & there is now very little pressure on the noise |
More to the point is what is happening at the back end of the bullet - nothing. With all the air bunching up in front of the projectile, the tail won't be able to do any steering. To keep the projectile flying straight at that speed, spin stabilization will have to do what drag stabilization can't.
Another fly in the ointment is the trans-sonic region. That shock wave doesn't just form by magic - it forms and dissipates randomly around the projectile starting in the mid 800's (FPS) right up to the speed of sound. Kind of like having a squirming girlfriend riding on the handlebars of your bicycle; steering becomes difficult.
It takes a lot of energy to keep a projectile flying supersonic. Witness supersonic jets - big motors and lots of fuel consumption. A projectile has to rely on the initial energy resulting from its mass and muzzle velocity, and that gets robbed as it rubs through the air. A powder burner solution is to launch a slippery bullet really fast (and spin the bejeebers out of it) so it stays supersonic and true. Even supersonic airguns aren't much faster than the speed of sound, and the projectile will probably transition into the tran-sonic region at some point during the flight.
It might be fun to get one of those ballistics programs and model the situation. Use the software to estimate the ballistic coefficient of the proposed "pellet," and "fire" it at different muzzle velocities. Then see what happens downrange. |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:33 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
Here is an interesting diagram I found:
As you can see, the Coefficient of Drag starts increasing at about 75% of Mach (ie just over 800 fps, as Slavia says).... It keeps increasing until about Mach 1.2 (~1300 fps).... This means that the meager ballistics coefficients of our pellets (about 0.010 to 0.035) gets even worse in the transonic region....
A .22 LR bullet has a ballistics coefficient of 0.145 (ie 5 to 15 times as good as a pellet).... and they still fall subsonic before they get to 100 yards....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:14 pm |
|
|
| Jaxom |
| Senior Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2008 |
| Posts: 927 |
|
|
|
 |
| Thanks rsterne for proving me wrong!!! I argued with the nuns that tried to teach me algebra over and over, that I will NEVER need to know this stuff in the real world... OY! |
|
_________________ .22 2300kt Crosman Custom |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:52 pm |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
If you look at those wads of led that they put in .50 air rifles... Those aren't Diabolo shaped. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:02 pm |
|
|
| kanyon |
| Silver Status Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 09 Aug 2008 |
| Posts: 1582 |
| Location: New Zealand |
|
|
 |
| broommaster2000 wrote: |
If you look at those wads of led that they put in .50 air rifles... Those aren't Diabolo shaped. |
WOW...They arn't either..
the round ones ..they have a central mass.
the other type bullet shaped...they are so heavy and fly that slow that
a neg/low pressure dose NOT acure along there sides so there is friction/drag...and when/if there try to turn side on to the on coming air flow they get pushed back to noise first....drive down the road at 100kph
in yer car and stick a peice of wood out the window end wise to the on comeing air flow the try and turn it side on..it will get pushed back end wise |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|