Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page
Argentina Australia Belgium Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece India
Italy Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Norway Russian Federation South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom United States
AirGunHome.com: THE Worldwide Airgun Forum


AirGunSeals.com Main Page Link
Air Gun Home Forum Index Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics » New guy with the obligatory question
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
New guy with the obligatory question 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:52 pm Reply with quote
dogsguts
New Member
New Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Hi everyone. Im taking the step away from all the noise & commotion to air. I do have a cheap .177 break barrel that is 38 years old (had from new) & still fires well but im selling off some big bore burners and have decided to get a better air rifle.

Im keen on either the Diana 56TH in .22 or the Diana 470TH in .22 but for the life of me i cannot google or search info on the real difference to the under cocking style of the 470 against the side cocking of the 56. I have only ever used break barrels.

Im doing nothing in particular with the rifle ..bit of plinking/target etc and will be fitting a scope.

Is there any definable for and against either cocking style ?

Cheers.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:58 pm Reply with quote
broommaster2000
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 5714
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Not really. It's kinda whatever floats your boat. I personally think sidelevers LOOK better but that's just flavour. Mr. Green

I owned a Diana 48. Pretty good and heavy gun. They're quality guns and don't really need tuning because they're good out of the bawks.

_________________
BIG GAP
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:18 pm Reply with quote
dogsguts
New Member
New Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
broommaster2000 wrote:
Not really. It's kinda whatever floats your boat. I personally think sidelevers LOOK better but that's just flavour. Mr. Green

I owned a Diana 48. Pretty good and heavy gun. They're quality guns and don't really need tuning because they're good out of the bawks.


Ok cheers for that BM. Never having used either i wasn't sure. I agree with the sidelever looking a bit better also.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:25 pm Reply with quote
donec
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 836
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area
I don't have much experience with either one, but I have had both and found that my wife had trouble with the underlever due to her short arms and the length from a good hold on the stock and the end of the under lever. However the side lever was a short enough reach for her to have no problem.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:36 pm Reply with quote
dogsguts
New Member
New Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
donec wrote:
I don't have much experience with either one, but I have had both and found that my wife had trouble with the underlever due to her short arms and the length from a good hold on the stock and the end of the under lever. However the side lever was a short enough reach for her to have no problem.

Tks donec. Operating isnt an issue for me as im 6'4 & 250 with the gorilla's arm gene. All these years ive been waiting to find a use for them and it was there all the time.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:05 pm Reply with quote
AirGunEric
Site Admin
Site Admin
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 6930
Location: "Out There"
I might suggest that before buying a side-lever or under-lever you find someone that has one you can try out. While I like the fact there is no such thing as barrel-breech shifting and no possibility of scope positioning changes as could be possible on a break-barrel- I find side/under levers somewhat inconvenient, especially so as I like to be extra cautious when putting my fingers in holes that have some potential for cutting them off.

Of course, my first experience with an underlever/sidelever was a BAM B3/Industry Brand B-4, so this may have tainted my view from the get-go.

_________________
`

I'd say "I care."

But I'd be lying.


Canadian Airgun Supplier: http://www.scopesandammo.com/storefront
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:08 pm Reply with quote
donec
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 836
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area
AirGunEric wrote:
I like to be extra cautious when putting my fingers in holes that have some potential for cutting them off.
My Gamo CFX had a rotating breech, so it was safe in that respect. Maybe there are other brands with that kind of breech.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:29 am Reply with quote
kanyon
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 1582
Location: New Zealand
Hi....
Not to long ago I did a tune on a Diana 54...
same action as the 56....
Go for the 54 or 56 the recoiless system has
to be used to be beleaved...It should be law that all guns have it..
as far as the action releasing while loading..there is a 4 stage
lock in the breach ,,the breach has to jump 4 catching claws to close
plus the trigger saftey is put on automaticly when yer cock the lever...

Mate go with the 54/56..yer won't be disapointed...

Pete

_________________
Career Infinity PCP .22
Webley Patriot .25
Hatsan mod 75 .22
Hatsan mod 99 .177 (Quattro & SAS)
Kral underlever .177


.............................................


.
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:27 am Reply with quote
dogsguts
New Member
New Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
kanyon wrote:
Hi....
Not to long ago I did a tune on a Diana 54...
same action as the 56....
Go for the 54 or 56 the recoiless system has
to be used to be beleaved...It should be law that all guns have it..
as far as the action releasing while loading..there is a 4 stage
lock in the breach ,,the breach has to jump 4 catching claws to close
plus the trigger saftey is put on automaticly when yer cock the lever...

Mate go with the 54/56..yer won't be disapointed...

Pete


Cheers mate. What scope would you put on it ? Also looking for a laser if you have a recommendation.

The one good thing about getting to middle age is being able to afford stuff that you couldn't have dreamed of in the days of paisley shirts & flares !
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:28 am Reply with quote
Slavia
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 4382
Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA
Quote:
What scope would you put on it ? Also looking for a laser if you have a recommendation.


Whatever scope you get I would highly recommend an adjustable objective lens. If you have a burner scope corrected for 100 yards, it won't be too far off at 200. Within the airgun envelope (say, 5 to 100 yards) there is a huge difference and it helps to be able to adjust. AO can also be used as a rangefinder.

For a fixed range in the backyard or basement a simple reticle is fine (eg., duplex). For shooting at variable ranges outdoors I like mil dots. Airgun pellets are slow to begin with and rapidly slow from there, so trajectory is not very flat. The mil dots help you correct for elevation (stadia lines do the same thing).

Some guys use lasers in conjunction with a scope to estimate range.

When you get to the point of worrying about pellet trajectory there is a pretty good (free) software package called Chairgun.

_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:37 pm Reply with quote
dogsguts
New Member
New Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Slavia wrote:
Quote:
What scope would you put on it ? Also looking for a laser if you have a recommendation.


Whatever scope you get I would highly recommend an adjustable objective lens. If you have a burner scope corrected for 100 yards, it won't be too far off at 200. Within the airgun envelope (say, 5 to 100 yards) there is a huge difference and it helps to be able to adjust. AO can also be used as a rangefinder.

For a fixed range in the backyard or basement a simple reticle is fine (eg., duplex). For shooting at variable ranges outdoors I like mil dots. Airgun pellets are slow to begin with and rapidly slow from there, so trajectory is not very flat. The mil dots help you correct for elevation (stadia lines do the same thing).

Some guys use lasers in conjunction with a scope to estimate range.

When you get to the point of worrying about pellet trajectory there is a pretty good (free) software package called Chairgun.


Cheers Slavia, great help...i was looking at objective. I will check the mil dots out.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:49 am Reply with quote
kanyon
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 1582
Location: New Zealand
dogsguts wrote:
kanyon wrote:
Hi....
Not to long ago I did a tune on a Diana 54...
same action as the 56....
Go for the 54 or 56 the recoiless system has
to be used to be beleaved...It should be law that all guns have it..
as far as the action releasing while loading..there is a 4 stage
lock in the breach ,,the breach has to jump 4 catching claws to close
plus the trigger saftey is put on automaticly when yer cock the lever...

Mate go with the 54/56..yer won't be disapointed...

Pete


Cheers mate. What scope would you put on it ? Also looking for a laser if you have a recommendation.

The one good thing about getting to middle age is being able to afford stuff that you couldn't have dreamed of in the days of paisley shirts & flares !


Leapers 3/9X40AO....would be my choice..

Pete

_________________
Career Infinity PCP .22
Webley Patriot .25
Hatsan mod 75 .22
Hatsan mod 99 .177 (Quattro & SAS)
Kral underlever .177


.............................................


.
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:33 pm Reply with quote
dogsguts
New Member
New Member
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
kanyon wrote:
dogsguts wrote:
kanyon wrote:
Hi....
Not to long ago I did a tune on a Diana 54...
same action as the 56....
Go for the 54 or 56 the recoiless system has
to be used to be beleaved...It should be law that all guns have it..
as far as the action releasing while loading..there is a 4 stage
lock in the breach ,,the breach has to jump 4 catching claws to close
plus the trigger saftey is put on automaticly when yer cock the lever...

Mate go with the 54/56..yer won't be disapointed...

Pete


Cheers mate. What scope would you put on it ? Also looking for a laser if you have a recommendation.

The one good thing about getting to middle age is being able to afford stuff that you couldn't have dreamed of in the days of paisley shirts & flares !


Leapers 3/9X40AO....would be my choice..

Pete


Tks Pete. Looks good.
View user's profile Send private message
New guy with the obligatory question 
  Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  

Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.


Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
Partial Styling Supplied by Vjacheslav Trushkin Themes Database.