Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page
Argentina Australia Belgium Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece India
Italy Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Norway Russian Federation South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom United States
AirGunHome.com: THE Worldwide Airgun Forum


AirGunSeals.com Main Page Link
Air Gun Home Forum Index Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics » Airgun Ballistics Goto page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
Airgun Ballistics 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:17 am Reply with quote
broommaster2000
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 5714
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Some explanations on Airgun Ballistics. I hope to simplify things for newcomers, as some of them are often mesmerized by impressive pellet speeds. My goal is especially to keep this SIMPLE!

For Example:

A good entry level Gamo can probably shoot a .177 calibre 8.42 grain at 924 FPS which converts to about 16 FPE. This is a best case scenario.

Gamo rifles often do about 865 FPS at 14 FPE with those 8.42 grainers.

A Benjamin Discovery in .22 at about 20 FPE with 15.94 grain pellets shoots 750 FPS. Doesn't shoot as fast, but does contain more energy.

FPS = Feet per Second

FPE = Feet Pounds of Energy (ft/lbs)

Do correct me if I'm wrong. This isn't a thread about which rifle is better, just how powerfull they are and how they work. It's also to get the myth out of the world of high pellet speeds. They mean nothing. I felt the need for a sticky on this subject because a lot of people still have the wrong idea about fps. Power is not measured in FPS alone, you'll need weight and speed. Exclamation Also, I get a bit tired of explaining this every time. Mr. Green

_________________
BIG GAP
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:54 am Reply with quote
rsterne
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2998
Location: Coalmont, BC
Another good reason not to be mesmerized by claims of high fps.... Once pellets are travelling in the transonic region (above Mach 0.8 = 900 fps).... they lose energy at a HUGE rate.... A "normal weight" wadcutter (ie 7.9 gr in .177 or 14.3 gr. in .22) starting at 1100 fps will lose about 100 fps (17% of it's energy) in the first FIVE YARDS.... Shocked

Look for an accurate rifle and select a pellet weight which keeps the velocity in the 900 fps range for best performance.... Wink

Bob

_________________
Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 9:14 pm Reply with quote
jeager106
Member
Member
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 37
Location: Ohio
O.K.
Published speeds are way big time exagerations.
Then what .22 airgun will give an honest 900 f.p.s.?
Not PCP, co2 or springer only. 900 fps would tickle me silly if I could find an air gun that would deliver such ballistics.

_________________
If nothing changes, nothing changes.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:28 pm Reply with quote
sniper
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 28 Nov 2008
Posts: 3752
Location: Star, Idaho
jeager106 wrote:
O.K.
Published speeds are way big time exagerations.
Then what .22 airgun will give an honest 900 f.p.s.?
Not PCP, co2 or springer only. 900 fps would tickle me silly if I could find an air gun that would deliver such ballistics.


unless a beeman kodiak/webley patriot, none without light pellets which are useless...

900 means 800 tops.
1000 means 900 tops.

you can tune one to do so and recoil is harsh.
i have 1 magnum springer. 870 fps rws hobby'd .22/11.9
that means 790/14.3. springer lose interest in .22 past 16 fpe IMO.

_________________
I believe in gun control,
If there's a gun around I
want to be controlling it.......
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:34 pm Reply with quote
rsterne
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2998
Location: Coalmont, BC
I've never owned one.... but a friend on another forum swears his BAM B-28 (RWS 350 clone) gets 880 fpr with 14.2 gr pellets stock right out of the box.... He has owned both that and a 350 and says the B-28 is actually more powerful.... and not from just one example but several....

Take it for what it's worth....

Bob

_________________
Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 11:14 pm Reply with quote
Slavia
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 4382
Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA
Quote:
Once pellets are travelling in the transonic region (above Mach 0.8 = 900 fps).... they lose energy at a HUGE rate....


Plus the accuracy problems with a (partly) drag-stabilized pellet getting knocked around by a supersonic shock wave that forms and dissipates at random.

_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:36 am Reply with quote
NZ Shooter
Suspended
Joined: 17 Dec 2011
Posts: 146
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
I realise this is an old thread, but my Patriot .22 is sitting at 901 fps 10 shot average, with 15.43gn pellets. Just under 28fpe. It shoots sweet, and I do not endorse bulls**t.It's un-tuned, un-modified
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:23 am Reply with quote
radar
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 1138
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA
NZ Shooter wrote:
I realise this is an old thread, but my Patriot .22 is sitting at 901 fps 10 shot average, with 15.43gn pellets. Just under 28fpe. It shoots sweet, and I do not endorse bulls**t.It's un-tuned, un-modified

So it would be probably be advertized, in the US anyway, as 1000-1100 FPS.
I just mutiply what is on the label by 0.85 to try to estimate actual muzzle velocity before I purchase.
But then, if you are exceeding about 900-950 FPS, you probably want a heavier pellet anyway.

Advertised MV is useless by itself, as Broomaster said. Energy is what you ultimately want to know.

I find, so far, that the muzzle energy as given on Archer Airguns online catalog, is reasonably accurate. Example: The give the Benji Disco max energy at about 25 FPE, and you could expect about 21-22.
My Beeman RS2 in .22 cal. is listed there at 17.2 FPE max., IIRC, and that is very close to what I get with a chrono, scale, and calculator. (I get 17.0 average with 14.3 grain pellets.)
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:38 pm Reply with quote
MSEO
Member
Member
Joined: 26 Nov 2011
Posts: 30
A heavier pellet at a lower muzzle velocity but with the same muzzle energy as a light pellet and higher muzzle velocity will retain more energy further down range. Drag force is lower at lower velocity and the more massive pellet will be less affected by a given drag force.

If you enter different weights in chairgun pro keeping the muzzle velocity constant, the muzzle velocity will change. Then switch on "energy" markers in the embellishment menu, you can see the energy is retained further out.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:40 pm Reply with quote
MSEO
Member
Member
Joined: 26 Nov 2011
Posts: 30
Sorry. Different weight keeping the muzzle ENERGY constant...
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:22 am Reply with quote
radar
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 1138
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Good post MSEO. Yes drag is a function of the square of velocity, like energy is. So long as a projectile doesn't hit the ground before the target, the heavies keep whatever they started out with further on, like you said. Penetration tends to be better, too.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:47 am Reply with quote
airgunsarecool
New Member
New Member
Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 6
I'd like to see some air gun/pellet tests on ballistic gelatin. Cool
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:48 am Reply with quote
radar
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 1138
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA
airgunsarecool wrote:
I'd like to see some air gun/pellet tests on ballistic gelatin. Cool


http://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php/topic,23535.msg214019.html#msg214019

http://ballisticsgel.blogspot.com/

http://www.umarexusa.com/pages/airgunvideos.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ADd8sLa4WQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMWAnSeYQUo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZfute--upc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZfute--upc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZfute--upc
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:55 am Reply with quote
airgunsarecool
New Member
New Member
Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 6
radar wrote:
airgunsarecool wrote:
I'd like to see some air gun/pellet tests on ballistic gelatin. Cool


http://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php/topic,23535.msg214019.html#msg214019

http://ballisticsgel.blogspot.com/

http://www.umarexusa.com/pages/airgunvideos.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ADd8sLa4WQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMWAnSeYQUo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZfute--upc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZfute--upc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZfute--upc


Awesome, thanks
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:49 am Reply with quote
radar
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 1138
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Sure thing.
Here's another good one. This testing--by using the same air rifle in both .177 and .22 calibers--tends to indicate that momentum combined with pellet frontal area, rather than kinetic energy alone, is a major predictor of average projectile penetration.

Kinetic energy being a function of mass times the square of velocity determines total damage or displacement of the impacted tissue, along with the total amount of heat that is generated.

Momentum is a function of mass times velocity (not squared velocity) tends to be higher in heavier projectiles. Momentum, like kinetic energy is conserved, and tends to keep the projectile moving forward through resistance.

For example, a light projectile of a given nose profile, material, and frontal cross section traveling faster can generate the same impact damage, shock, and heat as the same design but heavier, slower projectile. But the heavier one will tend to generate less temporary cavity and penetrate deeper.

http://www.brassfetcher.com/Brass%20Fetcher%20Evaluates%200.177%20and%200.22%20inch%20airguns.pdf

-Rob
View user's profile Send private message
Airgun Ballistics 
  Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 2  
Goto page 1, 2  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  

Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.


Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
Partial Styling Supplied by Vjacheslav Trushkin Themes Database.