 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | ok here is a can of worms I just gotta open |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 3:09 pm |
|
|
| jimineecricket |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2011 |
| Posts: 83 |
| Location: beaver dam |
|
|
 |
| Can anyone out their talk to me intelegently on LDC's, brakes, and shrouds. For air rifles. I know you need some kind of stamp to own a "silincer" but I see alot of manufacures now have silincers moderatiors and shrouds on thier rifles. Then people throw in the word permanently mounted. Like the marauder All I got to do is unscrew the shroud and its off. nothing permanet there. THere a few places that offer a shroud/moderator but say it has to be done at there facility and permanetly mounted to be leagal. Then I see adds all time for LDC. It is all confusing to me. Then lastly the 22XX modders out there all have shrouds some so short I can hardly call it a shroud. What is the diff. what is legal with out a stamp or permit or what ever you need. Can I shroud a riflle that has no origanil shroud??? any knowledgable in put would be appreciated. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 3:44 pm |
|
|
| Alstone |
| Moderator & Site Supporter |

 |
 |
| Joined: 01 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 4139 |
| Location: Linconshire, ENGLAND |
|
|
 |
This is an International airgun forum and as such Silencers, Shrouds and LDC’s, can be talked about to your heart's content, but anything you do must abide by the laws of the country you live in.
As far as I know you can fit a silencer or shroud legally in the USA in most States for a fee of $200, also the attachment has to be registered, or something like that from what I understand.
Al |
|
_________________
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 6:01 pm |
|
|
| AirGunEric |
| Site Admin |

 |
 |
| Joined: 20 Jan 2007 |
| Posts: 6929 |
| Location: "Out There" |
|
|
 |
Technically speaking, for the US- suppressors ("silencer" is an incorrect term") require a license from the BATF. The fee to try and acquire such a license is $200.00 or thereabouts- and even if they do not grant a license, they keep the $200.00 fee.
The conventional view is that the BATF does not consider any airguns to be "firearms" and has thus essentially ignored them (which some states or municipalities may have other laws governing) in respect to suppressor laws.
That being said, it somehow came about a few years back that the BATF would not consider a suppressor on an airgun worthy of a license unless it was removable/transferable to a "true" powder-burning firearm. I don't know that this was ever a Ruling/Determination by the BATF, but this seemed to be the rationalization behind alot of non-US companies sending products to the US market with built-in, or "non-removable" suppressors- i.e. AirArms, AirForce, Gamo.
Then, along comes Crosman, a US-based company, and the Marauder, and now the newer .357 cal Rogue w/suppressor. Crosman does have some sort of lawyers/legal people (I have no idea who or where they are) and in my experience in how they interpret laws in other markets (i.e. Canada, Europe, etc.) where airgun laws are different than the U.S., they seem to make simplistic, often somewhat incorrect determinations as to what these foreign laws are/how to meet them. I would hope that they are not quite as quick in making opinions for US laws (i.e. their home territory)- but based on the Marauder and Rogue, it seems they are following the same logic as the foreign companies- if the suppressor cannot be removed and installed on a powderburner, it doesn't require a BATF license. Which, if we look at the design of the Marauder suppressor (I can't speak for the Rogue)- removing the shroud and installing it on a powderburner would not work- the shroud mounts/caps/baffles would all melt if installed on a powderburner- thus it is "non-transferable". |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:02 pm |
|
|
| jimineecricket |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2011 |
| Posts: 83 |
| Location: beaver dam |
|
|
 |
So building say a 22xx and putting on a shroud just like they do on a mrod would be ok according to how I interpret what you said. it is still a bit confusing to me. But what laws aren't !?!? Well that sort of helps. anyone else shed some more light on this subject.
| AirGunEric wrote: |
Technically speaking, for the US- suppressors ("silencer" is an incorrect term") require a license from the BATF. The fee to try and acquire such a license is $200.00 or thereabouts- and even if they do not grant a license, they keep the $200.00 fee.
The conventional view is that the BATF does not consider any airguns to be "firearms" and has thus essentially ignored them (which some states or municipalities may have other laws governing) in respect to suppressor laws.
That being said, it somehow came about a few years back that the BATF would not consider a suppressor on an airgun worthy of a license unless it was removable/transferable to a "true" powder-burning firearm. I don't know that this was ever a Ruling/Determination by the BATF, but this seemed to be the rationalization behind alot of non-US companies sending products to the US market with built-in, or "non-removable" suppressors- i.e. AirArms, AirForce, Gamo.
Then, along comes Crosman, a US-based company, and the Marauder, and now the newer .357 cal Rogue w/suppressor. Crosman does have some sort of lawyers/legal people (I have no idea who or where they are) and in my experience in how they interpret laws in other markets (i.e. Canada, Europe, etc.) where airgun laws are different than the U.S., they seem to make simplistic, often somewhat incorrect determinations as to what these foreign laws are/how to meet them. I would hope that they are not quite as quick in making opinions for US laws (i.e. their home territory)- but based on the Marauder and Rogue, it seems they are following the same logic as the foreign companies- if the suppressor cannot be removed and installed on a powderburner, it doesn't require a BATF license. Which, if we look at the design of the Marauder suppressor (I can't speak for the Rogue)- removing the shroud and installing it on a powderburner would not work- the shroud mounts/caps/baffles would all melt if installed on a powderburner- thus it is "non-transferable". |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:40 pm |
|
|
| AirGunEric |
| Site Admin |

 |
 |
| Joined: 20 Jan 2007 |
| Posts: 6929 |
| Location: "Out There" |
|
|
 |
| jimineecricket wrote: |
| So building say a 22xx and putting on a shroud just like they do on a mrod would be ok ... |
In as far as the manufacturers are going- as long as it's an airgun, and the suppressor cannot be transferred to/use on a powderburner- it appears it is not an issue. However, as mentioned, I don't know of anyone who has actually claimed to have seen such a ruling or determination from the BATF so there is likely some amount of risk involved if your local law enforcement types want to pick a bone with you.
If someone can actually find the/any actual determination/publication outlining this issue specifically- this would be helpful to anyone in the U.S.
Perhaps a call to the BATF by someone would be useful? |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:04 am |
|
|
| Gippeto |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 20 May 2010 |
| Posts: 55 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:53 am |
|
|
| justsayno |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 29 Nov 2009 |
| Posts: 46 |
| Location: South of Philly |
|
|
 |
Keep calling the feds, and some dimocrate will realize, we all should be paying a tax on these. I'd keep my mouth shut if I was you.. enjoy it., they are letting us have them without bling in their pocket.
Thats my 2 cents.
Does this help? |
|
_________________ If I could only be normal |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:35 pm |
|
|
| jimineecricket |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2011 |
| Posts: 83 |
| Location: beaver dam |
|
|
 |
| justsayno wrote: |
Keep calling the feds, and some dimocrate will realize, we all should be paying a tax on these. I'd keep my mouth shut if I was you.. enjoy it., they are letting us have them without bling in their pocket.
Thats my 2 cents.
Does this help? |
Saldy but true. Silince is golden or dont stir up what doesnt need to be. It all helps but still remains a mistery. Some people take the risk and ride the edge and some don't. It is sad all in all. Poking holes in paper and harvesting game should not be so complicated. Enjoy cucking lead in relative safe volume levels and plinking quitely in ones back yard should be simple. Fact is if a criminal wans to make a quite gun he will with no regard to any of this legal mumbo jumbo. Locks are for honest people as well as all these laws. It gets to point of no fun. All I can say is I am not a lucky fellow so for me it just aint worth it. I can legally shoot bows and air rifles in my back yard. I can also go to a local range if Iwant to make som noise. It just would be nice to target shoot with a bit less noise. There are a few nice quite guns on the market I can get and not have to hassle with all the red tape and risk. thanks all anymore info is allways welcomed. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:37 pm |
|
|
| yourdaddyjoe |
| Supporting Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 26 May 2008 |
| Posts: 4027 |
| Location: Tatorville, USA |
|
|
 |
One of the many good points about living in Idaho... If I's made in Idaho and stays in Idaho... BATF can KMA.....
Silence is golden... even on my burners... |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 1:48 pm |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| If I's made in Idaho and stays in Idaho... BATF can KMA |
I've said it before - I think this is the next big constitutional question. Joe can say that because the only constitutional basis for the federal government to regulate such things is a clause about interstate commerce. If it's made in Idaho and stays in Idaho... no basis for federal regulation.
I have read about similar things in Montana and Tennessee. In Minnesota there is an entrepreneur gearing up for incandescent light bulb production after they are (federally) banned in 2014. If it's made in Minnesota and stays in Minnesota....
It's a biggie - alcohol and tobacco (and associated taxation) could also potentially be at issue.
So back to moderators, LDC's, etc. - I think things are going to get real interesting. We never really did finish that little disagreement over states' rights back in the 1860's. |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:56 pm |
|
|
| jimineecricket |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2011 |
| Posts: 83 |
| Location: beaver dam |
|
|
 |
| Slavia wrote: |
| Quote: |
| If I's made in Idaho and stays in Idaho... BATF can KMA |
I've said it before - I think this is the next big constitutional question. Joe can say that because the only constitutional basis for the federal government to regulate such things is a clause about interstate commerce. If it's made in Idaho and stays in Idaho... no basis for federal regulation.
I have read about similar things in Montana and Tennessee. In Minnesota there is an entrepreneur gearing up for incandescent light bulb production after they are (federally) banned in 2014. If it's made in Minnesota and stays in Minnesota....
It's a biggie - alcohol and tobacco (and associated taxation) could also potentially be at issue.
So back to moderators, LDC's, etc. - I think things are going to get real interesting. We never really did finish that little disagreement over states' rights back in the 1860's. |
What baffles me is how some places are essentially making and selling silencers and calling them ldc's or shrouds. How can the do this and not get in trouble. After doing more research it seems even a soda bottle with pillow stuffing can be classified as a silencer. The penalties are out rageous! What really dicatates if I can be used on a fire arm or not. Man this is BS all for trying to be quite and enjoy a sport. What ever happend to "silence is golden" |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | update in some more info I got |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:52 am |
|
|
| jimineecricket |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2011 |
| Posts: 83 |
| Location: beaver dam |
|
|
 |
I contacted a few of the guys making LDC wondering about the leaglities. Here is some info the passed along take it fo what ever its worth to you.
Jim if you take the letter of the law the shroud is as illegal as an LDC, but as far as the LDC issue goes a court recently overturned a conviction of someone for having an illegal LDC stating that they are legal on air rifles, they only become silencers, which are illegal when they are used on a fire arm. The ATF does not want anything to do with air rifles as they are not fire arms, but ATF says that anything that can be used or modified to work on a fire arm to make it quieter is considered a silencer. That is the problem, the wording is so broad that almost anything can be used to make a gun quieter, even a potato or a plastic bottle, so the court ruled that it is the person who alters it or uses it on the fire arm who is guilty, stating it is the intent that makes the guilt. So if you never intend to use it on a fire arm there is no intent and you should be fine, just as an LDC could be modified to use on a fire arm, so can your shroud.
Jim the way the law is worded it is very bad, at least the court ruling overturned a conviction and said that it was not illegal to have a suppressor on an air rifle, it was only illegal to put one on a fire arm without a license and illegal to make them for a fire arm without a license. There are a lot of people who read into the law literally and accuse us of breaking the law, but I point out to them the court ruling and the fact that almost anything can be used to make a gun quieter, even a dishcloth over the end of the barrel. They have to use some common sense and understand that an air rifle by definition is not a fire arm and so it is not included in the same laws that apply to fire arms
Seems to me to be true if crossman can make a shourd how is it any different than a LDC. I can easily take off my shroud on my MROD and I am sure anybody could modify it if they wanted to to fit what ever they wanted to. Just cuase it is longer doesnt make it any different IMO Look at FX OR BSA they sell in the states ANyhow thought I would share hope it helps. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:37 am |
|
|
| RVTMaverick |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 05 Sep 2011 |
| Posts: 59 |
| Location: VA. |
|
|
 |
Hey Guys,
Sorry for this question as it seems everyone here knows what "LDC" means but me?
I'm sure as soon as someone says what it is.... I'll say DUOOOOOO
FWIW: The way I read it, it's not a problem as long as they (suppressors) never goes onto one of the Fire Arms in Your War Chest
I've said it for Years,.. All these Gun Laws.... The ONLY People they effect are the Honest people anyhow, as WE ALL know the Criminal is Very concerned about the Laws of the land!
Peace Jeff |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:57 am |
|
|
| Alstone |
| Moderator & Site Supporter |

 |
 |
| Joined: 01 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 4139 |
| Location: Linconshire, ENGLAND |
|
|
 |
LDC stands for Lead Dust Collector.
Only don't tell the Fed's
Al  |
|
_________________
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:24 am |
|
|
| RVTMaverick |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 05 Sep 2011 |
| Posts: 59 |
| Location: VA. |
|
|
 |
| Alstone wrote: |
LDC stands for Lead Dust Collector.
Only don't tell the Fed's
Al  |
Hey Al,
Well, IF You're NOT pulling my chain.... "Lead Dust Collector" would Never have been on "My" Radar!
Seems the Topic was really dealing with a Question about "Supressors" so why LDC unless I'm just missing the marke here... I don't get it. Remember, I am NEW to AirGuns, as I have never owned one before approx. 3 to 4wks ago now!
Never even had a bb gun as a kid.
Peace Jeff |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|