 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Is 7 yards an "acceptable" zero range? |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:49 am |
|
|
| Sag |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2011 |
| Posts: 12 |
|
|
|
 |
I've got my AM77 and the cheap little 4x scope that came with it zero'd in pretty much perfectly at 7 yards... Getting the pellets to match was only a challenge of keeping my hand and trigger-break steady. (Okay, I'm just bragging a little there, I've never had a air gun that could do that before :P)
Anyway, is this a good zero range if I'm only looking to shoot up to 30 yards? I've been reading about pellet trajectory and the line-of-sight of the scope intersecting it twice during flight, and have noticed how it causes some shots to go high and some low, etc. and I think that I'll be able to compensate okay with hold-over ( though I haven't had a calm enough day to see, too much wind lately).
However, I'm still not sure if there would be any real advantage of zeroing in to 20 yards? From what I've read and seen from various trajectory software, my gun might have a much flatter trajectory over the range I want to cover if I zero in at 20 yards versus what I saw at a 7 yard zero, but I don't know exactly how much those figures pertain to my particular rifle in respect to velocity, height of the scope above the bore, and all the other variables plugged into such software.
Only real reason I prefer zero'ing to 7 right now is that I can do it in my garage which is preferable, so if it's "good enough" I don't know if I should keep it at 7 or if there's good reason to zero it to 20. I'll want to be able to hit on targets inside 1/2" anywhere within 30 yards, so I'm wondering if I'll be able to do that with the scope I ordered (9x w MilDot and adjustable objective) with the current zero figuring the hold-over, or if I'll still need to zero in to something that gives me a flatter trajectory through the line-of-sight. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:40 am |
|
|
| Crosman140 |
| Senior Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 13 Dec 2008 |
| Posts: 663 |
| Location: USA |
|
|
 |
Someone who knows what they are talking about will be along soon.
With your current scope, I'd zero it at the distance you will be shooting at the most. If you mostly shoot 7 yards, zero at 7. If you shoot 20 yards, then 20.
Without mil dots, it will be difficult to adjust your point of impact. But with the new scope you are looking at, that will make this much easier.
I believe a lot of shooters zero at 20-25 yards and then adjust using mil dots and holdover for closer and further targets.
Currently, the two shooters I use the most are my Crosman G1, zeroed at 20 yards that I use for hunting, and my Crosman 1377 that is zeroed at about 10 yards for garage shooting. That way, I can grab the gun that is zeroed for the task and not have to make any major scope adjustments to go shooting. |
|
_________________ My Critter Gitters
.22 Crosman 140 (1955)
.177 Crosman G1 (2009)
.177 Crosman 1377 (2009)
.177 Daisy 880 (2019)
BB Daisy Red Ryder (2012)
BB Daisy Buck (2019)
BB Crosman 1600 (1980)
BB Marksman 1010 (1979) |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:30 am |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| Currently, the two shooters I use the most are my Crosman G1, zeroed at 20 yards that I use for hunting, and my Crosman 1377 that is zeroed at about 10 yards for garage shooting. |
I do the same. The guns I use outdoors are zeroed at 25 yards, and the indoor guns are set for 10 meters. The next step after zeroing is to shoot at ranges closer and farther than the zero range. That way you can determine how much higher or lower to shoot at those ranges. A mil dot reticle is a great help in estimating holdover (or hold under). |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:56 pm |
|
|
| Bozo |
| Veteran Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 29 Jun 2009 |
| Posts: 107 |
| Location: The remote parts of El Dorado County, CA |
|
|
 |
Messing about with ballistics software is fun and will give you an idea of all the variables involved, but to get a concrete answer like you want you'll need a chronograph to go along with the software. Short of that, you'll have to do as Slavia said and get some targets, set them up every five yards and see what the pellets are actually doing.
My guess, without knowing the pellets you're shooting or the velocities involved, is that zeroed at 7 yards, you'll be shooting high at an intermediate range, say at 15-20 yards, and low at 30 yards, but that's just a WAG. Get a bunch of targets, measure off some ranges and do some shooting; then you'll know exactly what your gun/pellet/scope combo is doing whatever the range. Then write the results down on a 3x5 card and tape it to your stock for reference in the field. Once in the field, when you have a fairly good distance estimate to your target (or use a rangefinder so you *know* the range to the target) you can glance at the card and know exactly what your hold over/under needs to be. That card will still be handy when you get your mil-dot scope, but you may want to re-do it so it reads something like "27 yards=2nd dot down".
Remember that if you change scopes, use different pellets, or tune your rifle you'll need to do it over again. |
|
_________________ Sheridan Blue Streak , Barska Red Dot sight, .20
Gamo Big Cat 1200, 4x32 Ruger scope, .177
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:17 pm |
|
|
| Mark5043 |
| Silver Status Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 12 Apr 2009 |
| Posts: 1379 |
|
|
|
 |
Hey Sag....Here's a link to Chairgun Pro.."It's free by the way".It's nice software to play around with,and has a fantastic set of tools. It will give you an idea of what's going on with your set up.However as Bozo said, You really need to get a chronograph to take full advantage of the program,if you want to be spot on in calculations.
http://www.hawkeoptics.com/us/chairgun/download.php |
|
_________________
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:38 pm |
|
|
| Sag |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2011 |
| Posts: 12 |
|
|
|
 |
| Mark5043 wrote: |
Hey Sag....Here's a link to Chairgun Pro.."It's free by the way".It's nice software to play around with,and has a fantastic set of tools. It will give you an idea of what's going on with your set up.However as Bozo said, You really need to get a chronograph to take full advantage of the program,if you want to be spot on in calculations.
http://www.hawkeoptics.com/us/chairgun/download.php |
Nice, I've heard about this software, but I didn't think it was free.
Bozo,
I'm shooting Crosman Wadcutters that are 7.4 gr and Predator Polymags that are 8. I heard somewhere that Crosman rated this gun to 755 with 5.1 gr BBs, so I figured about 600 and 625 fps for my 7.4 and 8 gr pellets.
I was playing around with it and noticed that the POI didn't shift much when trying 600 fps, 625, and even 700 fps--well, it moved about half an inch to an inch. How accurate are these projections with a real-world velocity? I'm getting my new scope today so I will actually be able to discern differences in half an inch--I don't want to blame it all on this scope that came with it, but it's pretty crappy based on all reports and I was surprised how dead on it was at 7 yards. I think it started to show its true colors at 20 yards the other day, took me a while to shoot a 30 amp house fuse, and that's just a little larger than one inch wide. I think that was just my bad vision plus the weak 4x magnification though, the crosshairs covered the whole fuse.
Anyway, I'm rambling, I'm getting that new scope today, so I'm just wondering how accurate the program will be with these estimated velocities. I guess I'll find out... Maybe I won't have to buy a chronograph. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:06 pm |
|
|
| domer_pyle |
| Senior Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2009 |
| Posts: 523 |
|
|
|
 |
| Chairgun is pretty realistic for what it is but if you want any type of accurate result you have to do the testing on the range. Chairgun is awesome for getting a ballpark idea or using it to see how zeroing at 25 yards compares to 45 yards and lots of other stuff. But you probably shouldn't rely solely on what it says |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:31 pm |
|
|
| Sag |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2011 |
| Posts: 12 |
|
|
|
 |
| domer_pyle wrote: |
| Chairgun is pretty realistic for what it is but if you want any type of accurate result you have to do the testing on the range. Chairgun is awesome for getting a ballpark idea or using it to see how zeroing at 25 yards compares to 45 yards and lots of other stuff. But you probably shouldn't rely solely on what it says |
I was in part wondering if I could use it to estimate what my FPS was using the trajectory projections. I found out today that its MilDot estimation is pretty much dead on when talking about 6-7 yards in the garage.
Speaking of MilDots, I got my scope like I said and have been loving it. The AO is wicked, and 9x is a considerable amount more magnification. Shooting in my garage isn't really much of a challenge with the new scope at 6 yards, I can pretty much match the pellet holes shot-for-shot unless I'm on something lower than 5x, and even then I get some super tight groups with it. A quality scope really makes the difference. I got it zero'd into half-inch groups at 25 yards; I think I could be matching them if I had better trigger/breath control or an appropriate bench.
I got lucky that I had enough room on the gun for the scope, I guess I didn't really understand what Full Size meant when I ordered it.
Check out this group I shot trying to figure out the MilDots. I had some confusion initially between whether to use the 3rd or 4th MilDot and how far my actual target was. After I measured it and found it was 17 feet, I also found that Chairgun was telling me to use the correct 3rd MilDot, and that's when I started making matches. Before that I thought I was shooting at 7 yards and used the data Chairgun gave me and still shot this... So from this group to matches, it seems like Chairgun is very accurate.
Anyway, I'm pretty happy with how dead on Chairgun has been even with my estimated velocity because it really helps me figure out how high I might need to hold to get half inch groups, I'm just wondering how close to my actual velocity my estimate needs to be at the 20-30 yard ranges for the information it's giving me to be that reliable, but as you said I've already figured it out for the most part by practical shooting--and it's hard for me to actually shoot that precisely at that distance to make good comparisons.
I've got to say though, the whole thing has left me really wondering what my actual FPS is. Sometimes the groups I shoot match more closely to what Chairgun says I should get at the 700 fps range, but everything that I read says I shouldn't get that close to the rated fps. I tried doing that whole "poor man's chronograph" trick by measuring the time between the bang and the pellet hitting the target, but my mic wasn't good enough to get any kind of accuracy with that--I got anywhere from 500-800 fps figures, and a few times 1000, so I know that's garbage.
Anyone think it would be worth buying a chronograph to get all the variables exact? |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|