 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | picking a scope is hard.... help please. |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:29 am |
|
|
J5311 |
Member |

|
 |
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 |
Posts: 35 |
Location: NJ |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 12:06 pm |
|
|
rsterne |
Moderator |

 |
 |
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
Posts: 2998 |
Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
With a 9X scope, a 40 mm objective is plenty.... and also still OK on a 12X.... If you go to 16X I would go to the 50mm.... but you MAY need high rings.... I have a Leapers 4-16 x 50 AO on my Diana 34 and it nearly hits the top of the tube.... It's pretty big and heavy for average use and won't focus closer than 10 yards.... On most of my airguns I prefer the Leapers 3-9 x 40 AO which focuses down to 5 yards....
Make sure you purchase a scope with an adjustable objective (AO) so that you can focus on close targets and eliminate parallax error.... I also prefer the MilDot reticle and the Leapers is nice because it has an "Extended MilDot" with 6 dots (plus the post) instead of just 4 dots.... I have never had a problem with any of the Leapers scopes on a Springer....
You do get what you pay for, especially when you get up into Bushnell quality or higher.... I have a Bushnell 5-15 x 40 AO Legend and it is crystal clear and as bright as most 50mm scopes.... but its $250.... Even at that price, it's not a "high-priced" scope....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:17 pm |
|
|
donec |
Senior Member |

|
 |
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 |
Posts: 836 |
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area |
|
|
 |
You say with a 9X scope, a 40 mm objective is plenty so what would be the negative of a 3-9x32AO scope? |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:20 pm |
|
|
Alstone |
Moderator & Site Supporter |

 |
 |
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 |
Posts: 4139 |
Location: Linconshire, ENGLAND |
|
|
 |
I have a Hawke Airmax 3-9x40 and used it on my Tx200 a very nice scope and rated for springers. Hawke also supply a free software program to go with this sight (Download it from Hawke's site) which uses the Map 6 recital settings.
All in all a very nice scope.
Al |
|
_________________
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:11 pm |
|
|
rsterne |
Moderator |

 |
 |
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
Posts: 2998 |
Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
Quote: |
what would be the negative of a 3-9x32AO scope |
Not as bright an image, particulaly on 9X....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:09 pm |
|
|
fritz |
Silver Status Member |

 |
 |
Joined: 25 Nov 2008 |
Posts: 2442 |
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia |
|
|
 |
Having used an RWS 4x32 non AO, Tasco 3-9x40 non AO, and a CP 4-16x40 AO on my 34...
I would go with a 3-9x40 AO, to do it all over again. All scopes performed well, and have placed pellets where they needed to go. The 4x32 is OK to learn how to shoot with, but isn't enough for 20+ yards on targets. 3-9x40 non AO had paralax issues at shorter distances, on more than 5x. 4-16x40 was the best, but I never used it on 16x. Just too much scope for that gun. I liked how it put weight on the rifle, though.
4-12x40 would also be a good choice, but for my preferences, the higher magnification wouldn't get used. If you shoot more targets, then the 4-12 would be the way to go. IMO x50 is overkill on this rifle. x32 is not enough.
Summary, shoot a lot of targets? Use 4-12x40. Do everything? 3-9x40. Either way, get an AO. |
|
_________________ "I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa
Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.
It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person. |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:46 pm |
|
|
donec |
Senior Member |

|
 |
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 |
Posts: 836 |
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area |
|
|
 |
rsterne wrote: |
Quote: |
what would be the negative of a 3-9x32AO scope |
Not as bright an image, particulaly on 9X....
Bob |
Thanks |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:11 am |
|
|
J5311 |
Member |

|
 |
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 |
Posts: 35 |
Location: NJ |
|
|
 |
YAY more questions!
the more i find out the more questions i have...
this is the scope I am looking at now...
http://www.pyramydair.com/s/a/Leapers_UTG_3_12x44AO_SWAT_Rifle_Scope_Illuminated_Mil_Dot_Reticle_1_4_MOA_30mm_Tube_Weaver_Rings/2985
1. i will assume because 30mm is 5mm lager then the 1'' that it will allow more light into the score resulting in a brighter picture at low light conditions.
2. are there any negative aspects to this scope compared to the others that i have mentioned?
3. should I jump on the deal because there are a limited number left?
4. Because i will have the 34 and the leapers slope compensator will the medium rings be too high? |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:18 am |
|
|
fritz |
Silver Status Member |

 |
 |
Joined: 25 Nov 2008 |
Posts: 2442 |
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia |
|
|
 |
You should be fine since you have the droop base on there.
Looks like a good scope. Like the magnification range. |
|
_________________ "I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa
Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.
It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person. |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:31 am |
|
|
J5311 |
Member |

|
 |
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 |
Posts: 35 |
Location: NJ |
|
|
 |
someone posted that they are using it on their AR15 and hasn't given a bad remark o i guess it can withstand an airgun. The only thing i'm worried about Leapers brand is the reticles. But seeing posts, pyramid air seems to take care of everything for the customers. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:06 pm |
|
|
rsterne |
Moderator |

 |
 |
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
Posts: 2998 |
Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
I had one of the models of Leapers 3-12 x 44 AO scopes (they have had at least three, mine didn't have the illuminated reticle).... and I was very disapointed in it compared to my 3-9 x 40 AO Leapers.... First of all, the low power was about 4.5 x, not 3 x.... As a result, the image at the lowest power was not as bright in marginal light conditions (dusk) which is when you often use low power.... The field of view also suffered and from what I could see the 30mm tube size did nothing except provide room inside for the side focus mechanism.... Lastly, it only focuses down to 10 yards, compared with 5 yards for the 3-9....
I sold mine cheap, and will never buy another.... IMO, the 3-9 x 40 AO is a FAR superior scope both in performance and value....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|