Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page
Argentina Australia Belgium Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece India
Italy Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Norway Russian Federation South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom United States
AirGunHome.com: THE Worldwide Airgun Forum


AirGunSeals.com Main Page Link
Air Gun Home Forum Index Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Air Gun Home Forum Index » Optics » picking a scope is hard.... help please.
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
picking a scope is hard.... help please. 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:29 am Reply with quote
J5311
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 35
Location: NJ
ok. so i'm getting an rws 34. now most people say you only need a 3-9 scope.
1. why not a 4-12?

i hear that you get what you pay for.
2. are leapers scopes good, or should i spend a little more money on saw a hawke?

and the objective size.
3. does it REALLY matter if you have a 40 or 50 size. does it really make a difference? I went into the store to look at scopes and couldn't see the difference

here are the ones i was looking at. all good helpful comments are welcome.
http://www.pyramydair.com/s/a/Leapers_5th_Gen_3-9x40_AO_Mil-Dot_Rifle_Scope_with_R_G_1_Tube/659
http://www.pyramydair.com/s/a/Hawke_Sport_Optics_Airmax_4-12x40AO_Rifle_Scope_Illuminated_Map_6_Reticle_1_4_MOA_1_Tube/3030
http://www.pyramydair.com/s/a/Leapers_5th_Gen_4-16x50AO_Rifle_Scope_Illuminated_Red_Green_Mil-Dot_Reticle_Zero_Lock_Reset/1808
http://www.pyramydair.com/s/a/Hawke_Sport_Optics_Airmax_3-9x40AO_Rifle_Scope_Map_6_Reticle_1_4_MOA_1_Tube/2550
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 12:06 pm Reply with quote
rsterne
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2998
Location: Coalmont, BC
With a 9X scope, a 40 mm objective is plenty.... and also still OK on a 12X.... If you go to 16X I would go to the 50mm.... but you MAY need high rings.... I have a Leapers 4-16 x 50 AO on my Diana 34 and it nearly hits the top of the tube.... It's pretty big and heavy for average use and won't focus closer than 10 yards.... On most of my airguns I prefer the Leapers 3-9 x 40 AO which focuses down to 5 yards....

Make sure you purchase a scope with an adjustable objective (AO) so that you can focus on close targets and eliminate parallax error.... I also prefer the MilDot reticle and the Leapers is nice because it has an "Extended MilDot" with 6 dots (plus the post) instead of just 4 dots.... I have never had a problem with any of the Leapers scopes on a Springer....

You do get what you pay for, especially when you get up into Bushnell quality or higher.... I have a Bushnell 5-15 x 40 AO Legend and it is crystal clear and as bright as most 50mm scopes.... but its $250.... Even at that price, it's not a "high-priced" scope....

Bob

_________________
Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:17 pm Reply with quote
donec
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 836
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area
You say with a 9X scope, a 40 mm objective is plenty so what would be the negative of a 3-9x32AO scope?
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:20 pm Reply with quote
Alstone
Moderator & Site Supporter
Moderator & Site Supporter
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 4139
Location: Linconshire, ENGLAND
I have a Hawke Airmax 3-9x40 and used it on my Tx200 a very nice scope and rated for springers. Hawke also supply a free software program to go with this sight (Download it from Hawke's site) which uses the Map 6 recital settings.

All in all a very nice scope.

Al

_________________


View user's profile Send private message ICQ Number
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:11 pm Reply with quote
rsterne
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2998
Location: Coalmont, BC
Quote:
what would be the negative of a 3-9x32AO scope

Not as bright an image, particulaly on 9X....

Bob

_________________
Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count!
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:09 pm Reply with quote
fritz
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 2442
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia
Having used an RWS 4x32 non AO, Tasco 3-9x40 non AO, and a CP 4-16x40 AO on my 34...

I would go with a 3-9x40 AO, to do it all over again. All scopes performed well, and have placed pellets where they needed to go. The 4x32 is OK to learn how to shoot with, but isn't enough for 20+ yards on targets. 3-9x40 non AO had paralax issues at shorter distances, on more than 5x. 4-16x40 was the best, but I never used it on 16x. Just too much scope for that gun. I liked how it put weight on the rifle, though.

4-12x40 would also be a good choice, but for my preferences, the higher magnification wouldn't get used. If you shoot more targets, then the 4-12 would be the way to go. IMO x50 is overkill on this rifle. x32 is not enough.

Summary, shoot a lot of targets? Use 4-12x40. Do everything? 3-9x40. Either way, get an AO.

_________________
"I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa

Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.

It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:46 pm Reply with quote
donec
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 836
Location: central Texas Pflugerville area
rsterne wrote:
Quote:
what would be the negative of a 3-9x32AO scope

Not as bright an image, particulaly on 9X....

Bob
Thanks
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:11 am Reply with quote
J5311
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 35
Location: NJ
YAY more questions!

the more i find out the more questions i have...
this is the scope I am looking at now...
http://www.pyramydair.com/s/a/Leapers_UTG_3_12x44AO_SWAT_Rifle_Scope_Illuminated_Mil_Dot_Reticle_1_4_MOA_30mm_Tube_Weaver_Rings/2985


1. i will assume because 30mm is 5mm lager then the 1'' that it will allow more light into the score resulting in a brighter picture at low light conditions.
2. are there any negative aspects to this scope compared to the others that i have mentioned?
3. should I jump on the deal because there are a limited number left?
4. Because i will have the 34 and the leapers slope compensator will the medium rings be too high?
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:18 am Reply with quote
fritz
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 2442
Location: New Jersey- outside of Philadelphia
You should be fine since you have the droop base on there.

Looks like a good scope. Like the magnification range.

_________________
"I never set out to be wierd, it was always everyone else who called me it" -Frank Zappa

Speed is impressive, accuracy is deadly.

It's not that I'm not a people person, it's just that I'm not a stupid people person.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:31 am Reply with quote
J5311
Member
Member
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 35
Location: NJ
someone posted that they are using it on their AR15 and hasn't given a bad remark o i guess it can withstand an airgun. The only thing i'm worried about Leapers brand is the reticles. But seeing posts, pyramid air seems to take care of everything for the customers.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:06 pm Reply with quote
rsterne
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2998
Location: Coalmont, BC
I had one of the models of Leapers 3-12 x 44 AO scopes (they have had at least three, mine didn't have the illuminated reticle).... and I was very disapointed in it compared to my 3-9 x 40 AO Leapers.... First of all, the low power was about 4.5 x, not 3 x.... As a result, the image at the lowest power was not as bright in marginal light conditions (dusk) which is when you often use low power.... The field of view also suffered and from what I could see the 30mm tube size did nothing except provide room inside for the side focus mechanism.... Lastly, it only focuses down to 10 yards, compared with 5 yards for the 3-9.... Rolling Eyes

I sold mine cheap, and will never buy another.... IMO, the 3-9 x 40 AO is a FAR superior scope both in performance and value....

Bob

_________________
Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count!
View user's profile Send private message
picking a scope is hard.... help please. 
  Air Gun Home Forum Index » Optics
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  

Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.


Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
Partial Styling Supplied by Vjacheslav Trushkin Themes Database.