 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Initial Impressions of my New HW97 |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:14 pm |
|
|
| SteveM |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 23 |
| Location: Orlando, Florida, USA |
|
|
 |
After many years of desire for an HW97 (and the HW77 before that) I finally bought one. It arrived a couple of weeks ago and I've had a chance to shoot it a little since, so I thought I'd share my first impressions.
In a separate post, I indicated that I had ordered it from one company just to have the order canceled due the recent sale of Beeman. I placed an order with another supplier (Straight Shooters) and got one of the last two that they had. I ordered the rifle in .20 Cal as I already have a .177 Feinwerkbau (FWB 300s).
Out of the box I was very impressed. Very solid, substantial feel and great finish. The wood is pretty nice for an out-of-the-box gun and the metal finish is just superb. Looking it over the only criticism that I would have is that the rubber butt plate is not very well fitted to the stock. The butt plate is slightly larger than the stock, but nothing to really complain about.
I mounted a Bushnell Elite 3200 scope (5-15X40) using a one-piece mount and a Beeman scope stop to prevent backwards shift of the mount. The scope has traditional hunting adjustments under dust caps; in retrospect I wish it had turrets. Shoulda sought out a tactical model I guess, but don't like the mil-dot reticles on them. I'm in dialog with Rick Lake to see if he can manufacture turret style adjustment knobs. We'll see.
I took the rifle out to my local range along with a sampler of pellets and two cans of Beeman FTS's. I had ordered the pellet sampler along with my rifle and glad that I did. Straight Shooters has a really nice sampler that comes with what looks like a sample of every pellet that they carry in .20 Cal.
As a competition high power and smallbore shooter, I'm accustomed to having a sling on my rifles for use in shooting accurately. I use my Anschuetz fore-end stop and match sling on the FWB, but obviously have no provision to do so on the HW97. I may look to mount a hunting sling on the side of the stock for use in carrying while hunting and in shooting. However, I suspect that the characteristics of vibration on the rifle may preclude the use of a sling in any fashion.
The first shot dieseled, but I managed to get the scope sighted in. After the first shot, I didn't notice any dieseling, but did notice some smoke wafting from the barrel when I opened the breech to reload. Not sure if that's a sign of continued dieseling or if it's just normal from the pressure change (from high to low) in the barrel during the firing process.
Overall impression: Despite the mechanical similarity of the HW97 to my FWB, the HW97 is a lot more crude in trigger and vibration. Obviously, the HW97 has a bit more power and lacks the anti-recoil mechanism that the FWB has. The rifle seems to be very accurate. I was shooting in the sitting position with no support and managed to shoot some one inch groups at 25 yds. Most of the spread was very likely due to my insubstantial position. I found the HW97 a lot harder to shoot accurately than my FWB 300s. The main reason was the recoil (or vibration). The FWB has almost no perceptible vibration due to the design of the rifle. Also the FWB trigger is very, very light compared to the HW97. The record trigger is better than the trigger on most .22's I've fired (except for my Anschuetz target rifle), but is still much harder and unpredictable than my FWB. However, the rifle performed flawlessly. After shooting a few groups on paper targets, I began plinking at some clay target shards and soda cans that someone had left on the berm. I found that I could pick off the shards of clay target at will, very rarely missing. I ended up shredding the soda can. All told, I guess I ran about 100 pellets through the gun with no mishaps. In short, a very high quality gun that I'm very pleased with. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Re: Initial Impressions of my New HW97K |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:49 pm |
|
|
| creeper |
| New Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 18 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 6 |
| Location: Ravensdale, WA. |
|
|
 |
I have two HW97Ks... one in beech and one in blue laminate, both .177 caliber, so I thought I'd comment.
First of all, congratulations on your purchase!
| SteveM wrote: |
| Looking it over the only criticism that I would have is that the rubber butt plate is not very well fitted to the stock. The butt plate is slightly larger than the stock, but nothing to really complain about. |
You may want to look into Morgan adjustable but plates... assuming you can get away with a longer LOP, or would have an interest in cutting down the stock.
| SteveM wrote: |
| As a competition high power and smallbore shooter, I'm accustomed to having a sling on my rifles for use in shooting accurately. I use my Anschuetz fore-end stop and match sling on the FWB, but obviously have no provision to do so on the HW97. I may look to mount a hunting sling on the side of the stock for use in carrying while hunting and in shooting. However, I suspect that the characteristics of vibration on the rifle may preclude the use of a sling in any fashion. |
You're right, it may not be practical to use a sling. Even though I find my HW97Ks to have little in the way of hold sensitivity... until you are trying to shoot very small groups or very tiny targets, I would imagine that unless you can control the consistency of sling tension to a very high level, it would induce some degree of inconsistency into your shooting.
| SteveM wrote: |
| The first shot dieseled, but I managed to get the scope sighted in. After the first shot, I didn't notice any dieseling, but did notice some smoke wafting from the barrel when I opened the breech to reload. Not sure if that's a sign of continued dieseling or if it's just normal from the pressure change (from high to low) in the barrel during the firing process. |
My wood stocked 97K has over 1500 shots thru it... and it still smokes, although it has little to no effect on accuracy. My blue laminate has only about 400 shots thru it, and it never smoked from day one.
When I take them both apart for a cleaning and lubrication protocol, I fully expect to see some sort of variation that would cause this difference.
| SteveM wrote: |
| Overall impression: Despite the mechanical similarity of the HW97 to my FWB, the HW97 is a lot more crude in trigger and vibration. |
Agreed. I'm used to 3/4 ounce Jewell BR triggers on centerfire benchrest rifles, so no production springer designed for FT, including the trigger on the AA TX200, meets that level of quality. However, either trigger can be improved upon with a careful stone, polish and lube regimen.
Trigger quality is a relative thing. Most airgunners think the 97K and TX200 triggers are great... as compared to the triggers of other common spring piston rifles. If you've never used a Jewell, FWB or other true "match" trigger, the point of reference is somewhat limited.
| SteveM wrote: |
The rifle seems to be very accurate. I was shooting in the sitting position with no support and managed to shoot some one inch groups at 25 yds. Most of the spread was very likely due to my insubstantial position.
|
I seldom shoot from a sitting position, but a sub inch group from a sketchy position at 25 yds seems pretty darn good to me. Either of my 97Ks will put 5 (unsorted) pellets into .065" groups at 10 yards from the bench and shoot 200-17X postal match targets... and I'd bet your 97K would as well.
Cheers,
C |
|
_________________ I have a few guns and stuff. |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:28 pm |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
Hey Steve, the HW97k shoots nice in FT position. The balance is perfect for shooting like that.
And believe me when I say that with the right tuning these will do their job great. I got a buddy who tuned the crap out of his and that might be the best springer I've ever shot. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:31 am |
|
|
| SteveM |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 23 |
| Location: Orlando, Florida, USA |
|
|
 |
Thanks B. I'm planning to shoot a few hundred through it then considering to send it to Paul Watts for tune. Then maybe an FT match or two. I shot an FT event some years ago with the FWB, but it was a little underpowered when it came to the 50 yd shots. I expect the HW97 to fare a bit better.
Thanks for the replies. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:51 am |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
The HW97(k) is a typical 12 Fpe (16.5 joule) rifle, where the standard FWB300 is a typical 5.5 Fpe (7.5 Joule) rifle.
Some other tips are to at least relube the whole thing, and add a spring guide. Standard Weihrauch lubing pretty much sucks. They're also often a bit to twangy for rifles that cost that much. RWS/Diana rifles for instance don't have that twang, but they're also more in the hunting segment as their "comparable" models typically do about 16-18 Fpe whereas the HW97k is around 12-14 Fpe.
A good compromise between power and accuracy and balance.
Diana rifles aren't that balanced.  |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:19 pm |
|
|
| SteveM |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 23 |
| Location: Orlando, Florida, USA |
|
|
 |
| broommaster2000 wrote: |
The HW97(k) is a typical 12 Fpe (16.5 joule) rifle, where the standard FWB300 is a typical 5.5 Fpe (7.5 Joule) rifle.
... |
Broom,
I haven't chrono'd mine yet, but the Beeman website listed the HW97 MKIII muzzle energy at 13.6 FPE in .177 and 14.6 Fpe in .20 Cal. I've read some independent reviews on the gun that measured velocity of a 7.9 gr. pellet as high as 910 fps in the HW97. That works out to about the same (14.53 Fpe)...and I don't think these are 'tuned' rifles. I understand that the MKIII has a longer stroke than it's predecessors to make up for some of the loss of piston size necessitated by the sliding compression tube design.
Incidenatally, I did some searching on the 300s. One velocity chart puts the 300s at 6.0 Fpe. As you say, a dramatic reduction in power. However, what that 300 doesn't have in power it sure has in accuracy and ease of shooting. The recoiless action allows me to put pellets in very, very tight little groups. I've dispatched a couple of squirrels with it and they dropped like sacks of sand. Of course, the pellets entered at the eye, so did not have a lot of resistance to penetration. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:20 pm |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
Woops, sorry, I ment with a "typical 12 Fpe rifle" that they're really good at that powersetting because they shine during FT matches. They're not sold in .20 a lot over here. (As a matter of fact, try finding someone who owns a .20 over here. 90% chance it's a Benjamin Sheridan pumper and those aren't really used for matches as far as I can tell... Would make for an interesting match though! )
The HW97's do shine regardless their powersetting.
Over here, the power regulations for match shooting are 7.5 joule, which is about 5,5 fpe. Therefore, all FWB's over here are at that powersetting. You can tune em up to 12 Fpe (16,5 joules) though!
Just so you know where I'm coming from.  |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:37 pm |
|
|
| SteveM |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 23 |
| Location: Orlando, Florida, USA |
|
|
 |
Roger that. Understand entirely. I'm planning to shoot a few hundred shots through mine, then see if Paul Watts will spend some time on it. Looking for a good, smooth shooter for rodents and small game; maybe even go back to shooting some FT.
Cheers. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:46 am |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
Something else that sprung to mind, that buddy of mine with the tuned one can do pretty good groups at about 50 yards. I recall numbers like 0.78.
I can post a link to the dutch forum so you can see what he had done to it, as a matter of fact, I think I will:
http://www.luchtbuks.net/index.php?showtopic=31178&st=0&p=256656&#entry256656
Using google translation you might find some good tips, if you have questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Just went trough that thread. Scroll down and you can see what a well tuned rifle is capable of: 11mm = 0.43! |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:58 pm |
|
|
| SteveM |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 03 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 23 |
| Location: Orlando, Florida, USA |
|
|
 |
| Thanks Broom. Very encouraging! |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|